IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/apsrev/v49y1955i03p747-761_06.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Indian and Western Political Thought: Coalescence or Clash?

Author

Listed:
  • Palmer, Norman D.

Abstract

American political scientists are still teaching courses labeled “Comparative Government†with little or no attention to the government and politics of the largest states of the world today, and they are still teaching something called “Political Theory†or “History of Political Thought†with no more than casual reference to the ideas underlying non-Western civilizations. The neglect of Indian polity is particularly striking and particularly serious, for apart from Western political thought it comprises probably the most extensive and most important body of political philosophy. Moreover, it is an integral part of the Hindu civilization of the past and the present. That civilization, as Radha-krishnan and Toynbee, among others, have pointed out, is alien to Western civilization, although there are many similarities; and the present encounter between the two civilizations comes at a time when both are in a period of crisis and transition. Such considerations are basic to an understanding of the stresses and strains in the relations of India with the Western world. Behind the tensions that arise between the United States and India, for example, lie differences in views of life and modes of thought and conduct, complicated by uncertainty, inner struggle, sensitivity, misunderstanding, and inexperience in playing new and difficult roles.

Suggested Citation

  • Palmer, Norman D., 1955. "Indian and Western Political Thought: Coalescence or Clash?," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 49(3), pages 747-761, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:49:y:1955:i:03:p:747-761_06
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S000305540006634X/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:49:y:1955:i:03:p:747-761_06. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/psr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.