IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/apsrev/v44y1950i02p358-379_05.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Generalists Versus Specialists in Social Science: An Economist's View 1

Author

Listed:
  • Spengler, J. J.

Abstract

“The theorist can never foresee what the experimenter will find when his range is extended to include fields at present inaccessible.†Man behaved economically, politically, and otherwise long before social scientists theorized about his behavior. In fact, present day social science is of comparatively recent origin, being the product of that progressive specialization which began in the eighteenth century. This specialization has produced diverse problems, with one of which the present paper is concerned. The problem in question is suggested by the central thesis of this paper: that although an economist (or political scientist) must delimit what he studies qua economist (or political scientist), his understanding of economic (or political) behavior is governed by his understanding of human behavior as a whole. While this paper was written primarily from the point of view of an economist to illustrate how psychology and noneconomic social science may contribute to our understanding of economic behavior, it also suggests how political science may draw upon the disciplines treated and indicates how economists envisage a number of questions of fundamental significance to students of government.

Suggested Citation

  • Spengler, J. J., 1950. "Generalists Versus Specialists in Social Science: An Economist's View 1," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 44(2), pages 358-379, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:44:y:1950:i:02:p:358-379_05
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0003055400057907/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:44:y:1950:i:02:p:358-379_05. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/psr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.