IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/apsrev/v118y2024i2p724-743_11.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Consolidating Progress: The Selection of Female Ministers in Autocracies and Democracies

Author

Listed:
  • NYRUP, JACOB
  • YAMAGISHI, HIKARU
  • BRAMWELL, STUART

Abstract

Though governments historically have been a men’s club, women are increasingly gaining access. We argue that democratic institutions are important drivers of women’s inclusion in government. This stems from the rationales of autocratic versus democratic leaders when selecting ministers. Autocrats fear a coup by inner-circle elites, who are mostly men, incentivizing them to assign ministerial positions as co-optation. In contrast, democratic leaders are accountable to the citizenry through elections and must satisfy increasing demands for gender equality. Furthermore, we argue that it is historical experience with democracy that matters, rather than the level, as it takes time to create an even playing field, change attitudes, and generate trust in democracy. To support this, we contribute with the first study using the most comprehensive dataset, WhoGov, on women’s access to cabinets. Overall, we show that democracy is a process that gradually enables women to enter the highest echelons of power.

Suggested Citation

  • Nyrup, Jacob & Yamagishi, Hikaru & Bramwell, Stuart, 2024. "Consolidating Progress: The Selection of Female Ministers in Autocracies and Democracies," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 118(2), pages 724-743, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:118:y:2024:i:2:p:724-743_11
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S000305542300062X/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:118:y:2024:i:2:p:724-743_11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/psr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.