IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/apsrev/v118y2024i2p654-670_7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Patterns of Affective Polarization toward Parties and Leaders across the Democratic World

Author

Listed:
  • REILJAN, ANDRES
  • GARZIA, DIEGO
  • FERREIRA DA SILVA, FREDERICO
  • TRECHSEL, ALEXANDER H.

Abstract

Research indicates that affective polarization pervades contemporary democracies worldwide. Although some studies identify party leaders as polarizing agents, affective polarization has been predominantly conceptualized as a product of in-/out-party feelings. This study compares levels of party affective polarization (PAP) and leader affective polarization (LAP) cross-nationally, using data from the Comparative Study of Electoral Systems. Applying like–dislike scales and an identical index to both concepts, we reveal that while the two strongly correlate, LAP is systematically lower than PAP. The United States emerges as an exceptional case, being the only country where LAP significantly exceeds PAP. Drawing on regime input/output and institutions as theoretical building blocks, we explore cross-national variations and show that the relative strength of LAP vis-à-vis PAP is increased by presidential regime type, poor government performance, and low party system fragmentation. The findings of this study contribute to the thriving research on affective polarization and personalization of politics.

Suggested Citation

  • Reiljan, Andres & Garzia, Diego & Ferreira Da Silva, Frederico & Trechsel, Alexander H., 2024. "Patterns of Affective Polarization toward Parties and Leaders across the Democratic World," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 118(2), pages 654-670, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:118:y:2024:i:2:p:654-670_7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0003055423000485/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:118:y:2024:i:2:p:654-670_7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/psr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.