IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/apsrev/v118y2024i1p69-87_6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Divided We Unite: The Nature of Partyism and the Role of Coalition Partnership in Europe

Author

Listed:
  • HAHM, HYEONHO
  • HILPERT, DAVID
  • KÖNIG, THOMAS

Abstract

Highlighting the strength of “partyism” in many democracies, recent scholarship pays keen attention to increasing hostility and distrust among citizens across party lines, known as affective polarization. By combining a conjoint analysis with decision-making games such as dictator and trust games, we design a novel survey experiment to systematically estimate and compare the strength of the partisan divide relative to other social divides across 25 European democracies. This design also allows us to investigate how the two components of affective polarization, in-group favoritism and out-group derogation, are moderated by the way parties interact with each other. We first find dominance of the partisan divide compared to other social divides that constitute traditional cleavages such as social class and religion. Second, we show that affective polarization in Europe is not primarily driven by out-group animus. Finally, we demonstrate that coalition partnership lessens affective polarization by reducing both in-group and out-group biases.

Suggested Citation

  • Hahm, Hyeonho & Hilpert, David & König, Thomas, 2024. "Divided We Unite: The Nature of Partyism and the Role of Coalition Partnership in Europe," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 118(1), pages 69-87, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:118:y:2024:i:1:p:69-87_6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0003055423000266/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:118:y:2024:i:1:p:69-87_6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/psr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.