IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/apsrev/v118y2024i1p127-143_9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From Pluribus to Unum? The Civil War and Imagined Sovereignty in Nineteenth-Century America

Author

Listed:
  • LEE, MELISSA M.
  • ZHANG, NAN
  • HERCHENRÖDER, TILMANN

Abstract

Contestation over the structure and location of final sovereign authority—the right to make and enforce binding rules—occupies a central role in political development. Historically, war often settled these debates and institutionalized the victor’s vision of sovereignty. Yet sovereign authority requires more than institutions; it ultimately rests on the recognition of the governed. How does war shape imagined sovereignty? We explore the effect of warfare in the United States, where the debate over two competing visions of sovereignty erupted into the American Civil War. We exploit the grammatical shift in the “United States” from a plural to a singular noun as a measure of imagined sovereignty, drawing upon two large textual corpuses: newspapers (1800–99) and congressional speeches (1851–99). We demonstrate that war shapes imagined sovereignty, but for the North only. Our results further suggest that Northern Republicans played an important role as ideational entrepreneurs in bringing about this shift.

Suggested Citation

  • Lee, Melissa M. & Zhang, Nan & Herchenröder, Tilmann, 2024. "From Pluribus to Unum? The Civil War and Imagined Sovereignty in Nineteenth-Century America," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 118(1), pages 127-143, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:118:y:2024:i:1:p:127-143_9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0003055423000096/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:118:y:2024:i:1:p:127-143_9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/psr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.