IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/apsrev/v106y2012i2piii-ix_1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Notes from the Editors

Author

Listed:
  • Anonymous

Abstract

We have readily assumed that, within Muslim countries, fundamentalists will most oppose American influence and policies, but Lisa Blaydes and Drew A. Linzer find a striking and perhaps surprising regularity: Anti-Americanism is most pronounced in the least observant Islamic countries. Moreover, opposition to the United States does not seem to be related to any particular American policies or to American culture generally. Anti-Americanism arises instead, they argue in “Elite Competition, Religiosity, and Anti-Americanism in the Islamic World,†from elite strategy, in which fundamentalist political factions fan anti-American sentiments to compete with more secular groups. That competition is most intense, and hence the anti-American strategy most frequently employed, in Islamic countries in which divisions between secular and religious forces are most pronounced. Employing a mix of statistical and case study methods, Blaydes and Linzer find that, within countries, observant Muslims are likelier to express anti-American sentiments; between countries, competition between secular and religious forces, and not fundamentalism, inspires anti-U.S. sentiment.

Suggested Citation

  • Anonymous, 2012. "Notes from the Editors," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 106(2), pages 1-1, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:106:y:2012:i:2:p:iii-ix_1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0003055412000214/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kwangsu Lee, 2020. "A generic construction for revocable identity-based encryption with subset difference methods," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(9), pages 1-25, September.
    2. Aric Hagberg & Nathan Lemons, 2015. "Fast Generation of Sparse Random Kernel Graphs," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(9), pages 1-12, September.
    3. Kwangsu Lee & Dong Hoon Lee, 2015. "Security Analysis of the Unrestricted Identity-Based Aggregate Signature Scheme," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(5), pages 1-8, May.
    4. Stanislav Sobolevsky & Izabela Sitko & Remi Tachet des Combes & Bartosz Hawelka & Juan Murillo Arias & Carlo Ratti, 2016. "Cities through the Prism of People’s Spending Behavior," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(2), pages 1-19, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:106:y:2012:i:2:p:iii-ix_1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/psr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.