IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/apsrev/v100y2006i04p659-665_06.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Century of Continuity and (Little) Change in the Undergraduate Political Science Curriculum

Author

Listed:
  • ISHIYAMA, JOHN
  • BREUNING, MARIJKE
  • LOPEZ, LINDA

Abstract

Although in recent years there has emerged a renewed interest in teaching and learning issues in the APSA, relatively little attention has been paid to the structure of the undergraduate political science curriculum. In this article we conduct a broad survey of articles that appeared in the APSR from 1906 to 1990 and find that (1) in the past the association paid much attention to the undergraduate political science curriculum; (2) over time attention shifted from a conception of the major as promoting substantive knowledge to a conception that emphasized skills; and (3) current concerns regarding skills, sequencing, and capstone experiences were all discussed several decades before the appearance of the “Wahlke Report†in 1991. We offer an explanation for the ebb and flow of the attention curricular issues received historically in the APSA, and suggest what the future may hold for current efforts to reexamine the structure of the undergraduate political science curriculum.

Suggested Citation

  • Ishiyama, John & Breuning, Marijke & Lopez, Linda, 2006. "A Century of Continuity and (Little) Change in the Undergraduate Political Science Curriculum," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 100(4), pages 659-665, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:100:y:2006:i:04:p:659-665_06
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0003055406062551/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. repec:elg:eechap:15478_1 is not listed on IDEAS

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:100:y:2006:i:04:p:659-665_06. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/psr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.