IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/apsrev/v100y2006i04p651-658_06.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Review's Evolving Relevance for U.S. Foreign Policy 1906–2006

Author

Listed:
  • BENNETT, ANDREW
  • IKENBERRY, G. JOHN

Abstract

We review the relevance of the international relations articles published in the first 100 years of the Review for American foreign policy. We define a spectrum of “policy relevance†and give a brief overview of the Review's changing relationship to American foreign policy as the journal, the profession, and the foreign policy process evolved over the last century. We then look at the Review's role in key periods in American foreign policy, focusing in particular on the example of the democratic peace literature. We conclude that although the content of the journal has moved away from early aspirations to near-term and direct policy relevance, the journal has evolved toward basic research that influences American foreign policies by affecting what scholars teach students, publish in policy journals, write in newspaper op-eds, say on the media, advise political leaders, and do when they are themselves in public office.

Suggested Citation

  • Bennett, Andrew & Ikenberry, G. John, 2006. "The Review's Evolving Relevance for U.S. Foreign Policy 1906–2006," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 100(4), pages 651-658, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:100:y:2006:i:04:p:651-658_06
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S000305540606254X/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:100:y:2006:i:04:p:651-658_06. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/psr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.