IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/anacsi/v15y2021i1p173-203_8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On unbalanced data and common shock models in stochastic loss reserving

Author

Listed:
  • Avanzi, Benjamin
  • Taylor, Greg
  • Vu, Phuong Anh
  • Wong, Bernard

Abstract

Introducing common shocks is a popular dependence modelling approach, with some recent applications in loss reserving. The main advantage of this approach is the ability to capture structural dependence coming from known relationships. In addition, it helps with the parsimonious construction of correlation matrices of large dimensions. However, complications arise in the presence of “unbalanced data”, that is, when (expected) magnitude of observations over a single triangle, or between triangles, can vary substantially. Specifically, if a single common shock is applied to all of these cells, it can contribute insignificantly to the larger values and/or swamp the smaller ones, unless careful adjustments are made. This problem is further complicated in applications involving negative claim amounts. In this paper, we address this problem in the loss reserving context using a common shock Tweedie approach for unbalanced data. We show that the solution not only provides a much better balance of the common shock proportions relative to the unbalanced data, but it is also parsimonious. Finally, the common shock Tweedie model also provides distributional tractability.

Suggested Citation

  • Avanzi, Benjamin & Taylor, Greg & Vu, Phuong Anh & Wong, Bernard, 2021. "On unbalanced data and common shock models in stochastic loss reserving," Annals of Actuarial Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 15(1), pages 173-203, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:anacsi:v:15:y:2021:i:1:p:173-203_8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1748499520000196/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:anacsi:v:15:y:2021:i:1:p:173-203_8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/aas .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.