IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/agrerw/v51y2022i3p558-578_7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Food and agricultural industry locational determinants research: Aggregation bias and size measurement in the agricultural support industry

Author

Listed:
  • Carpenter, Craig Wesley
  • Van Sandt, Anders
  • Loveridge, Scott

Abstract

Federal administrative data present a valuable opportunity for food and agricultural industry locational outcome research. We review issues with aggregated U.S. public data and summarize current methods. An example empirical approach combines federal administrative and secondary data. We compare results with differing levels of industrial aggregation. Results indicate locational determinants vary in magnitude, sign, and significance across industries and their sub-industries, as well as between employers and non-employers – nuances commonly missed with public data. We conclude by emphasizing that studies relying on public (more-aggregated) data may miss locational outcome relationships or inappropriately generalize to sub-industries and suggest data access changes.

Suggested Citation

  • Carpenter, Craig Wesley & Van Sandt, Anders & Loveridge, Scott, 2022. "Food and agricultural industry locational determinants research: Aggregation bias and size measurement in the agricultural support industry," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 51(3), pages 558-578, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:agrerw:v:51:y:2022:i:3:p:558-578_7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1068280522000211/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Aaron Kinyu Hoshide, 2022. "Back to the Future: Agricultural Booms, Busts, and Diversification in Maine, USA, 1840–2017," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-24, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:agrerw:v:51:y:2022:i:3:p:558-578_7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/age .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.