IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/agrerw/v50y2021i1p127-149_7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Farm Producers' Household Consumption and Individual Risk Behavior after Natural Disasters

Author

Listed:
  • Wahdat, Ahmad Zia
  • Gunderson, Michael A.
  • Lusk, Jayson L.

Abstract

Understanding how farm household consumption responds to adverse income shocks can provide insight into household well-being and appropriate agricultural policy. Using a split-sample survey of Indiana specialty producers, where we randomly assign respondents to treatments that vary the size of a hypothetical income shock, we estimate the relationship between income loss and household consumption. Given that postdisaster producers' risk preferences are important for business decisions, we elicit producers' risk preferences. We find that food and miscellaneous expenses are the most sensitive to income losses. We also find evidence for decreasing absolute risk aversion among producers after the income loss shock.

Suggested Citation

  • Wahdat, Ahmad Zia & Gunderson, Michael A. & Lusk, Jayson L., 2021. "Farm Producers' Household Consumption and Individual Risk Behavior after Natural Disasters," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 50(1), pages 127-149, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:agrerw:v:50:y:2021:i:1:p:127-149_7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1068280521000022/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:agrerw:v:50:y:2021:i:1:p:127-149_7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/age .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.