IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ctf/journl/v71y2023i1p59-71.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Policy Forum: Digital Asset Mining and GST—Tax Policy Versus Public Policy

Author

Listed:
  • David Douglas Robertson

    (EY Law LLP, Toronto)

  • Selena Ing

    (EY Law LLP, Toronto)

Abstract

On February 4, 2022, the Department of Finance released draft legislation that, if enacted, would deem digital asset mining activities undertaken in Canada not to be "commercial activities" for goods and services tax (GST)/harmonized sales tax (HST) purposes. In 1991, Canada introduced the GST to remove sales tax as a cost of doing business in Canada with a view to making Canada's domestically produced goods and services more competitive in international markets. Yet 30 years later, Finance is proposing legislation hidden in the "special cases" provisions of the GST legislation that will make the 5 percent to 15 percent GST/HST an input cost to Canadian digital asset miners selling their computing services to non-residents of Canada. Further, it appears that Finance is doing so with an ulterior public policy objective—to impose financial market regulation and "know-your-client" rules on mining operators. This article provides an overview of how proof-of-work cryptocurrency blockchains operate, the parties involved, how GST would normally apply to the sector and to Canadian participants in particular, and why the proposed February 4, 2022 amendments are problematic from a tax policy perspective.

Suggested Citation

  • David Douglas Robertson & Selena Ing, 2023. "Policy Forum: Digital Asset Mining and GST—Tax Policy Versus Public Policy," Canadian Tax Journal, Canadian Tax Foundation, vol. 71(1), pages 59-71.
  • Handle: RePEc:ctf:journl:v:71:y:2023:i:1:p:59-71
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.32721/ctj.2023.71.1.pf.robertson
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ctf.ca/EN/Publications/CTJ_Contents/2023CTJ1.aspx
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.32721/ctj.2023.71.1.pf.robertson?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ctf:journl:v:71:y:2023:i:1:p:59-71. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jim Lyons (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.ctf.ca/EN .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.