IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ctf/journl/v71y2023i1p1-32.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

"Tax-Free": The Effect of a Heuristic Cue on the Choice Between a TFSA and an RRSP

Author

Listed:
  • Leslie Berger

    (Lazaridis School of Business and Economics, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, Ontario)

  • Jonathan Farrar

    (Lazaridis School of Business and Economics, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, Ontario)

  • Ruth Pogacar

    (Haskayne School of Business, University of Calgary)

  • Lu Y. Zhang

    (Ted Rogers School of Management, Toronto Metropolitan University)

Abstract

The authors investigate whether and, if so, the extent to which a heuristic cue, the term "tax-free," contained in the name of one of the two primary tax-sheltered savings plans in Canada—the tax-free savings account (TFSA)—biases individuals' saving preferences relative to the registered retirement savings plan. On the basis of the heuristic-systematic model of information processing, the authors predict that the term "tax-free" is a favourable heuristic cue that will suppress systematic processing and bias individuals toward selecting a savings plan with this term in its name. They conduct three experiments to test this proposition. Overall, the results suggest that individuals have a clear preference for a tax-sheltered savings plan with "tax-free" in its name—regardless of the content of accompanying explanatory information. The preference for savings plans with "tax-free" in the name may suggest the need for more education and financial advice to reduce the use of heuristics.

Suggested Citation

  • Leslie Berger & Jonathan Farrar & Ruth Pogacar & Lu Y. Zhang, 2023. ""Tax-Free": The Effect of a Heuristic Cue on the Choice Between a TFSA and an RRSP," Canadian Tax Journal, Canadian Tax Foundation, vol. 71(1), pages 1-32.
  • Handle: RePEc:ctf:journl:v:71:y:2023:i:1:p:1-32
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.32721/ctj.2023.71.1.berger
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ctf.ca/EN/Publications/CTJ_Contents/2023CTJ1.aspx
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.32721/ctj.2023.71.1.berger?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ctf:journl:v:71:y:2023:i:1:p:1-32. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jim Lyons (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.ctf.ca/EN .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.