IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ctf/journl/v69y2021i1p87-98.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Policy Forum: Should the Canada Revenue Agency Also Be a Social Benefits Agency?

Author

Listed:
  • Jennifer Robson

    (Carleton University, Ottawa)

  • Saul Schwartz

    (School of Public Policy and Administration, Carleton University, Ottawa)

Abstract

The Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) plays an important role in the delivery of benefits to Canadians, but should that role be expanded? The speed and ease with which several new income benefits were launched by the CRA during the COVID-19 pandemic have prompted the question of whether the agency should take on a much larger role as a social benefits agency, in addition to tax collector. We review the arguments for and against, noting important weaknesses that already impair the CRA's current role in benefit delivery and that would be exacerbated in an expanded role. On balance, we conclude that an expanded role is not the better choice. We suggest that the CRA might instead enhance one of its strengths—collecting and sharing information—so that other agencies can more effectively administer benefits not directly tied to the tax system.

Suggested Citation

  • Jennifer Robson & Saul Schwartz, 2021. "Policy Forum: Should the Canada Revenue Agency Also Be a Social Benefits Agency?," Canadian Tax Journal, Canadian Tax Foundation, vol. 69(1), pages 87-98.
    • Handle: RePEc:ctf:journl:v:69:y:2021:i:1:p:87-98
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.32721/ctj.2021.69.1.pf.robson
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ctf.ca/EN/Publications/CTJ_Contents/2021CTJ1.aspx
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.32721/ctj.2021.69.1.pf.robson?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jennifer, Robson & Lindsay M., Tedds, 2023. "The Canada Disability Benefit: Battling Abelism in Design and Implementation," MPRA Paper 116191, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ctf:journl:v:69:y:2021:i:1:p:87-98. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jim Lyons (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.ctf.ca/EN .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.