IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ctf/journl/v66y2018i2p375-386.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Policy Forum: Building a Tax Review Body That Is Fit for Purpose--Reconciling the Tradeoffs Between Independence and Impact

Author

Listed:
  • Jennifer Robson

    (Faculty of Public Affairs, Carleton University, Ottawa)

Abstract

In this brief opinion piece, I discuss various options for structuring and supporting a review of the federal tax system in Canada, including interactions with subnational tax measures. I focus in particular on the tradeoffs that must be made between independence from government and influence on government policy making. The traditional models that we are accustomed to thinking of--internal reviews by government officials, task forces, and royal commissions--all have strengths and weaknesses as mechanisms for conducting a comprehensive, transparent, independent, and influential review of the tax system. In addition to these options, I consider international examples, such as the United Kingdom's Mirrlees review. In the end, I suggest the creation of a publicly funded body with a standing mandate to conduct analysis, engage stakeholders, and make policy recommendations. Tax reform is unlikely to be a one-time policy need in Canada, and so we should build a tax review body fit for purpose.

Suggested Citation

  • Jennifer Robson, 2018. "Policy Forum: Building a Tax Review Body That Is Fit for Purpose--Reconciling the Tradeoffs Between Independence and Impact," Canadian Tax Journal, Canadian Tax Foundation, vol. 66(2), pages 375-386.
  • Handle: RePEc:ctf:journl:v:66:y:2018:i:2:p:375-386
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ctf.ca/EN/Publications/CTJ_Contents/2018CTJ2.aspx
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ctf:journl:v:66:y:2018:i:2:p:375-386. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jim Lyons (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.ctf.ca/EN .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.