IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ctf/journl/v65y2017i2p379-390.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Policy Forum: Charities and Politics--A Dubious Mix?

Author

Listed:
  • Geoffrey Hale

    (Department of Political Science, University of Lethbridge)

Abstract

Canadian constraints on political activity by charitable organizations have been based on traditional common-law distinctions between charitable activity and partisan political advocacy. This article evaluates proposals to expand tax preferences for political activities by charities and non-profit organizations. It examines both the structure of the charitable/non-profit sector and the patterns of charitable giving, and the relation of both to the sector's broader activities and other major funding sources, including direct government expenditures. It notes the historical reasons for accommodating charitable giving within the tax system, and the progressive erosion and concentration of the donor population in recent years. It suggests that expanding tax preferences for political dvocacy by charities and non-profits will increase pressures on the existing funding bases for many organizations and will potentially undermine public trust in the sector, as increased political competition for financial and policy support reduces distinctions between the public-interest and rent-seeking activities undertaken by members of the sector. Any changes to existing laws should be integrated with existing regimes for the funding of political parties and election campaigns.

Suggested Citation

  • Geoffrey Hale, 2017. "Policy Forum: Charities and Politics--A Dubious Mix?," Canadian Tax Journal, Canadian Tax Foundation, vol. 65(2), pages 379-390.
  • Handle: RePEc:ctf:journl:v:65:y:2017:i:2:p:379-390
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ctf.ca/EN/Publications/CTJ_Contents/2017CTJ2.aspx
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ctf:journl:v:65:y:2017:i:2:p:379-390. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jim Lyons (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.ctf.ca/EN .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.