IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/csb/stintr/v15y2014i1p67-82.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Modified Mixed Randomized Response Model

Author

Listed:
  • Housila P. Singh
  • Tanveer A. Tarray

Abstract

Socio-economic investigations often relate to certain personal features that people wish to hide from others in comprehensive inquiries, detailed questionnaires include numerous items. Data on most of them are frequently easy to procure merely by asking, but a few others can be on sensitive issues for which people are not inclined to state honest responses. For example, most people prefer to conceal the truth regarding their savings, the extent of their accumulated wealth, their history of intentional tax evasion and other illegal and or unethical practices leading to earnings from clandestine sources, crimes, trade in contraband goods, susceptibility to intoxication, expenditures on addictions of various forms, homosexuality, and similar issues which are customarily disapproved of by society. Open or direct queries often fail to yield reliable data on such confidential aspects of human life. Warner (1965) developed an alternative survey technique that is known as randomized response (RR) technique. Greenberg et al. (1971) presented a revised version of Warner's (1965) technique for qualitative variables. Later various modifications were given by several researchers [see Chaudhuri (2011)]. Kim and Warde (2005) and Nazuk and Shabir (2010) presented mixed randomized response models using simple random sampling with replacement sampling scheme which improves the privacy of respondents. In this paper we have suggested a modified mixed randomized response model to estimate the proportion of a qualitative sensitive variable. Properties of the proposed randomized response model have been studied along with recommendations. It has been shown that the suggested randomized response model is always better than Kim and Warde’s (2005) model while it is better than Nazuk and Shabbir’s (2010) model under some realistic conditions. Numerical illustrations and graphs are also given in support of the present study.

Suggested Citation

  • Housila P. Singh & Tanveer A. Tarray, 2014. "A Modified Mixed Randomized Response Model," Statistics in Transition new series, Główny Urząd Statystyczny (Polska), vol. 15(1), pages 67-82, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:csb:stintr:v:15:y:2014:i:1:p:67-82
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://index.stat.gov.pl/repec/files/csb/stintr/csb_stintr_v15_2014_i1_n6.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Housila P. Singh & Tanveer A. Tarray, 2013. "An alternative to Kim and Warde’s mixed randomized response technique," Statistica, Department of Statistics, University of Bologna, vol. 73(3), pages 379-402.
    2. Arijit Chaudhuri, 2004. "Christofides’ randomized response technique in complex sample surveys," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 60(3), pages 223-228, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Truong-Nhat Le & Shen-Ming Lee & Phuoc-Loc Tran & Chin-Shang Li, 2023. "Randomized Response Techniques: A Systematic Review from the Pioneering Work of Warner (1965) to the Present," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-26, April.
    2. Amitava Saha, 2007. "A simple randomized response technique in complex surveys," Metron - International Journal of Statistics, Dipartimento di Statistica, Probabilità e Statistiche Applicate - University of Rome, vol. 0(1), pages 59-66.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:csb:stintr:v:15:y:2014:i:1:p:67-82. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Beata Witek (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gusgvpl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.