IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cpp/issued/v48y2022i1p36-73.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Accounting for the Rising Caesarean Section Rate in Canada: What Are the Roles of Changing Needs, Practices, and Incentives?

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Baker
  • Maripier Isabelle
  • Mark Stabile
  • Sara Allin

Abstract

In most high-income countries, including Canada, the share of births by Caesarean section (C-section) has risen over the past decades to far exceed World Health Organization recommendations of the proportion justified on medical grounds (15 percent). Although unnecessary C-sections represent an important cost for health care systems, they are not associated with clear benefits for the mother and the child and can sometimes represent additional risks. Drawing on administrative records of nearly four million births in Canada, as well as macro data from the United States and Australia, we provide a comprehensive account of rising C-section rates. We explicitly consider the contributions of the main factors brought forward in the policy literature, including changing characteristics of mothers, births, and physicians as well as changing financial incentives for C-section deliveries. These factors account for at most one-half of the increase in C-section rates between April 1994 and March 2011. The majority of the remaining increase in C-sections over the period occurred in the early 2000s. We suggest that some event or shock in the early 2000s is likely the primary determinant of the recent strong increase in the C-section rate in Canada.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Baker & Maripier Isabelle & Mark Stabile & Sara Allin, 2022. "Accounting for the Rising Caesarean Section Rate in Canada: What Are the Roles of Changing Needs, Practices, and Incentives?," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 48(1), pages 36-73, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:cpp:issued:v:48:y:2022:i:1:p:36-73
    DOI: 10.3138/cpp.2021-017
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/cpp.2021-017
    Download Restriction: access restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3138/cpp.2021-017?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpp:issued:v:48:y:2022:i:1:p:36-73. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Iver Chong (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.utpjournals.press/loi/cpp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.