IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cpp/issued/v44y2018is1ps43-s55.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Who Goes into STEM Disciplines? Evidence from the Youth in Transition Survey

Author

Listed:
  • Ross Finnie
  • Stephen Childs

Abstract

This article presents an empirical analysis of access to post-secondary education (PSE) as it pertains to students in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) programs, who are vital to the nation’s economic performance, especially with respect to its information and communication technology (ICT) sector. The analysis is based on the rich Youth in Transition Survey, Cohort A (YITS–A), which follows a representative sample of Canadian youth age 15 in 1999 through to the normal point at which PSE decisions are made. The main findings include that female students go into STEM disciplines at a much lower rate than male students, even after controlling for a broad set of control variables, including high school grades in math and science. Conversely, visible minorities, especially those who are first-generation immigrants, and particularly those from a specific set of regions, participate at much higher rates than others. These results have implications for the ICT talent pool of the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Ross Finnie & Stephen Childs, 2018. "Who Goes into STEM Disciplines? Evidence from the Youth in Transition Survey," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 44(S1), pages 43-55, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:cpp:issued:v:44:y:2018:i:s1:p:s43-s55
    DOI: 10.3138/cpp.2017-077
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/cpp.2017-077
    Download Restriction: access restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3138/cpp.2017-077?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpp:issued:v:44:y:2018:i:s1:p:s43-s55. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Iver Chong (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.utpjournals.press/loi/cpp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.