IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cpp/issued/v44y2018is1ps30-s42.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Post-Secondary Student Choices and the Labour Shortage in Canada’s Information and Communication Technology Sector

Author

Listed:
  • Weili Ding
  • Steven F. Lehrer

Abstract

Employers in Canada’s information and communication technology (ICT) sector often claim that they face a shortage of technical talent. This shortage may arise in part from a sharp decline in undergraduate engineering and computing enrolment and graduation rates in Canada beginning in 2002. Even with a recent reversal in enrolment trends, the number of graduates in these fields remains well below the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development average. In this article, we discuss the trade-offs inherent in numerous policies and programs that have been considered in Canada to increase the supply of new graduates in these fields. We suggest that many existing programs are easy to implement and short term in nature but may also have unintended consequences by altering human capital investment decisions. Moreover, many existing policies create incentives that lead to different responses depending on student gender, thereby making it hard to simultaneously reduce labour shortages and boost gender equality in the ICT workforce. We summarize evidence from the economics of higher education literature on student major choice to point to alternative, more long-term policies and programs in which students can learn about their preferences and ability.

Suggested Citation

  • Weili Ding & Steven F. Lehrer, 2018. "Post-Secondary Student Choices and the Labour Shortage in Canada’s Information and Communication Technology Sector," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 44(S1), pages 30-42, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:cpp:issued:v:44:y:2018:i:s1:p:s30-s42
    DOI: 10.3138/cpp.2016-091
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/cpp.2016-091
    Download Restriction: access restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3138/cpp.2016-091?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpp:issued:v:44:y:2018:i:s1:p:s30-s42. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Iver Chong (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.utpjournals.press/loi/cpp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.