Author
Listed:
- Cecilia Benoit
- Michaela Smith
- Mikael Jansson
- Samantha Magnus
- Nadia Ouellet
- Chris Atchison
- Lauren Casey
- Rachel Phillips
Abstract
Confidence in the police is fundamental to citizens' willingness to report unlawful behaviour, share intelligence about crime, seek help when victimized, and generally comply with the law. Marginalized groups overwhelmingly report a lack of confidence that police will apply the law fairly. Although sex work research reports a wide range of negative experiences with the police, it is not known how common these experiences are because most research focuses solely on street-based sex workers and does not include quantitative measures. We report on confidence in the police through the analysis of relevant data gathered from in-person interviews with sex workers from six census metropolitan areas of Canada. Under the pre-2014 legal regime, our non-random sample of sex workers had lower confidence in police than estimated for other Canadians by the General Social Survey and were particularly unlikely to see police as treating sex workers fairly. Thematic analysis suggests this is primarily driven by stigma and discrimination. We also found a significant minority who reported the police to be a source of aid, suggesting that appropriate policy and program regimes could be developed to improve sex worker-police relations.
Suggested Citation
Cecilia Benoit & Michaela Smith & Mikael Jansson & Samantha Magnus & Nadia Ouellet & Chris Atchison & Lauren Casey & Rachel Phillips, 2016.
"Lack of Confidence in Police Creates a "Blue Ceiling" for Sex Workers' Safety,"
Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 42(4), pages 456-468, December.
Handle:
RePEc:cpp:issued:v:42:y:2016:i:4:p:456-468
DOI: 10.3138/cpp.2016-006
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpp:issued:v:42:y:2016:i:4:p:456-468. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Iver Chong (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.utpjournals.press/loi/cpp .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.