IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/col/000506/017550.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bioética y desarrollo sostenible: entre el biocentrismo y el antropocentrismo y su sesgo economicista

Author

Listed:
  • Carlos Alberto Gómez-Cano
  • Gloria Elena Estrada-Cely
  • Verenice Sánchez-Castillo

Abstract

La actual crisis del Desarrollo Sostenible en materia de credibilidad y efecto, con notorios impactos de tipo ambiental y cultural, supone una necesaria reflexión desde disciplinas contextuales como la bioética, que permitan rescatar el componente antrópico (racional y emocional) que tiene como principio, sin desconocer los demás componentes estructurales: ambiental y económico, este último con predominio histórico que le han conferido un sesgo economicista a las decisiones tomadas desde este contexto, y que han desdibujado la finalidad del principio como garante de calidad de buena vida futura. Con la investigación, que partió del análisis bibliográfico profundo mediante el uso de referentes generales de la teoría fundamentada, se pretendió identificar la postura filosófica que debería guiar el abordaje del análisis Bioético del Desarrollo Sostenible, ubicándola en el antropocentrismo débil o humanismos, desde donde se rescata la importancia de la especie humana sin desconocimiento del deber moral de consideración de las demás formas de vida que pueblan el planeta, y la necesidad de su preservación futura en condiciones de bienestar. ********************************************* The current crisis of sustainable development in terms of credibility and effect, with notorious environmental and cultural impacts, is a necessary reflection from contextual disciplines such as bioethics, which allow to rescue the anthropic component (rational and emotional) of the principle, without ignoring its other structural components: environmental and economic, the latter with a historical predominance that has conferred an economistic bias on the decisions taken from this context, and that have blurred the purpose of the principle as guarantor of quality of a good future life. With the research, which started from the deep bibliographical analysis by using general referents of the grounded theory, it was intended to identify the philosophical position that should guide the approach of the Bioethical analysis of Sustainable Development, placing it in the weak anthropocentrism or humanisms, from where rescues the importance of the human species without ignorance of the moral duty of consideration of the other forms of life that populate the planet, and the need for its future preservation in welfare conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Carlos Alberto Gómez-Cano & Gloria Elena Estrada-Cely & Verenice Sánchez-Castillo, 2018. "Bioética y desarrollo sostenible: entre el biocentrismo y el antropocentrismo y su sesgo economicista," Revista Clio América, Universidad del Magdalena, vol. 12(24), pages 255-267, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:col:000506:017550
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://revistas.unimagdalena.edu.co/index.php/clioamerica/article/view/2999/2279
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    medio ambiente – bioética – desarrollo sostenible – antropocentrismo – biocentrismo.;

    JEL classification:

    • Q2 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation
    • Q5 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics
    • Q57 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Ecological Economics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:col:000506:017550. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Revista CLIO (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/femagco.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.