IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/col/000129/011982.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Valoración probabilística versus borrosa, opciones reales y el modelo binomial. Aplicación para proyectos de inversión en condiciones de ambiguedad

Author

Listed:
  • Gastón Silverio Milanesi

Abstract

El trabajo tiene por objeto exponer la metodología, las ventajas y las debilidades del modelo binomial borroso de valoración de opciones reales como complemento del modelo binomial probabilístico. Para lograr lo anterior primero se presentan los modelos de opciones reales clasificados en probabilístico y borroso; luego se desarrolla el modelo binomial borroso incorporando: el método Marketed Asset Disclai- mer (MAD), rejillas binomiales borrosas y el índice pesimismo-optimismo, para estimar el valor esperado de las opciones del proyecto (VEOP). Se ilustra con un caso comparando los resultados obtenidos con el modelo borroso y el probabilístico. Finalmente se concluye que, en situaciones de falta de información (ambiguedad), la lógica borrosa es un complemento del modelo probabilístico para determinar el valor de la flexibilidad estratégica.

Suggested Citation

  • Gastón Silverio Milanesi, 2014. "Valoración probabilística versus borrosa, opciones reales y el modelo binomial. Aplicación para proyectos de inversión en condiciones de ambiguedad," Estudios Gerenciales, Universidad Icesi, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:col:000129:011982
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.icesi.edu.co/revistas/index.php/estudios_gerenciales/article/view/1808
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Opciones reales; Borroso; Binomial; Ambigüedad;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C44 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods: Special Topics - - - Operations Research; Statistical Decision Theory
    • G32 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Financing Policy; Financial Risk and Risk Management; Capital and Ownership Structure; Value of Firms; Goodwill

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:col:000129:011982. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Coordinador ICESI (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fciceco.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.