IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/urbpla/v5y2020i4p441-452.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

New Urbanism in the New Urban Agenda: Threads of an Unfinished Reformation

Author

Listed:
  • Michael W. Mehaffy

    (School of Architecture and the Built Environment, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden)

  • Tigran Haas

    (School of Architecture and the Built Environment, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden)

Abstract

We present evidence that New Urbanism, defined as a set of normative urban characteristics codified in the 1996 Charter of the New Urbanism, reached a seminal moment—in mission if not in name—with the 2016 New Urban Agenda, a landmark document adopted by acclamation by all 193 member states of the United Nations. We compare the two documents and find key parallels between them (including mix of uses, walkable multi-modal streets, buildings defining public space, mix of building ages and heritage patterns, co-production of the city by the citizens, and understanding of the city as an evolutionary self-organizing structure). Both documents also reveal striking contrasts with the highly influential 20th century Athens Charter, from 1933, developed by the Congrès Internationaux d’Architecture Moderne. Yet, both newer documents also still face formidable barriers to implementation, and, as we argue, each faces similar challenges in formulating effective alternatives to business as usual. We trace this history up to the present day, and the necessary requirements for what we conclude is an ‘unfinished reformation’ ahead.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael W. Mehaffy & Tigran Haas, 2020. "New Urbanism in the New Urban Agenda: Threads of an Unfinished Reformation," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(4), pages 441-452.
  • Handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v:5:y:2020:i:4:p:441-452
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/3371
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Susan Moore & Dan Trudeau, 2020. "New Urbanism: From Exception to Norm—The Evolution of a Global Movement," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(4), pages 384-387.
    2. Frolov, Daniil, 2021. "Transplantation of economic institutions: a post-institutional theory (expanded version)," MPRA Paper 108707, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v:5:y:2020:i:4:p:441-452. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.