IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/urbpla/v3y2018i3p1-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Henri Lefebvre, Planning’s Friend or Implacable Critic?

Author

Listed:
  • Michael E. Leary-Owhin

    (School of Law and Social Sciences, London South Bank University, UK)

Abstract

This is the first issue of an academic journal, of which I am aware, to focus on Henri Lefebvre and urban planning. Urban spatial planning evolved as a concept to integrate the complex social, economic, environmental, political and land use conundrums of late 20th century society. Similarly, the spatial ideas of Henri Lefebvre encompass these issues but stress the importance of everyday life, production, culture and history. This thematic issue of Urban Planning is predicated principally on three of Lefebvre’s major works: The Production of Space (Lefebvre, 1974/1991), Critique of Everyday Life (Lefebvre, 1947/1991) and The Urban Revolution (Lefebvre, 1970/2003). Lefebvre’s ideas regarding the investigation of cities and urban society have been taken up most vigorously in the fields of geography, urban studies and latterly architecture. Despite this, it is clear that Lefebvre’s five central concepts—the production of space, abstract space, everyday life, the right to the city and planetary urbanisation—provide powerful tools for the examination of urban planning, cities and urban society in the Global North and South. Anglophone urban planning first embraced Lefebvre’s ideas in the 1980s. Surprisingly then, it is only in the last ten years or so that urban planning academia and research has witnessed a blossoming of interest in Lefebvre’s ideas.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael E. Leary-Owhin, 2018. "Henri Lefebvre, Planning’s Friend or Implacable Critic?," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 3(3), pages 1-4.
    • Handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v:3:y:2018:i:3:p:1-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/1578
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ernestina S. Nkooe, 2018. "A Lefebvrian Analysis of Public Spaces in Mangaung, South Africa," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 3(3), pages 26-39.
    2. Yukihiro Yamamoto, 2018. "Reconsidering ‘Desire’ and ‘Style’: A Lefebvrian Approach to Democratic Orientation in Planning," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 3(3), pages 105-111.
    3. Antti Wallin & Helena Leino & Ari Jokinen & Markus Laine & Johanna Tuomisaari & Pia Bäcklund, 2018. "A Polyphonic Story of Urban Densification," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 3(3), pages 40-51.
    4. Andrzej Zieleniec, 2018. "Lefebvre’s Politics of Space: Planning the Urban as Oeuvre," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 3(3), pages 5-15.
    5. Thomas Honeck, 2017. "From squatters to creatives. An innovation perspective on temporary use in planning," Planning Theory & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(2), pages 268-287, April.
    6. Jan Lilliendahl Larsen & Jens Brandt, 2018. "Critique, Creativity and the Co-Optation of the Urban: A Case of Blind Fields and Vague Spaces in Lefebvre, Copenhagen and Current Perceptions of the Urban," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 3(3), pages 52-69.
    7. Bethany B. Cutts & Michael Minn, 2018. "Dead Grass: Foreclosure and the Production of Space in Maricopa County, Arizona," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 3(3), pages 16-25.
    8. Daniel Koch, 2018. "On Architectural Space and Modes of Subjectivity: Producing the Material Conditions for Creative-Productive Activity," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 3(3), pages 70-82.
    9. Francesco Chiodelli, 2013. "Planning and urban citizenship: suggestions from the thoughts of Henri Lefebvre," Planning Perspectives, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(3), pages 487-494, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Charalampos Tsavdaroglou & Chrisa Giannopoulou & Chryssanthi Petropoulou & Ilias Pistikos, 2019. "Acts for Refugees’ Right to the City and Commoning Practices of Care-tizenship in Athens, Mytilene and Thessaloniki," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(4), pages 119-130.
    2. Jianbo Han & Edwin H. W. Chan & Esther H. K. Yung & Queena K. Qian & Patrick T. I. Lam, 2022. "A Policy Framework for Producing Age-Friendly Communities from the Perspective of Production of Space," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-23, February.
    3. Windemer, Rebecca, 2019. "Considering time in land use planning: An assessment of end-of-life decision making for commercially managed onshore wind schemes," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    4. Vanessa Ágata de Abreu Santos & Jan van der Borg, 2023. "Cultural Mapping Tools and Co-Design Process: A Content Analysis to Layering Perspectives on the Creative Production of Space," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-18, March.
    5. Christine Mady, 2022. "The Evolutions, Transformations, and Adaptations in Beirut’s Public Spaces," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(1), pages 116-128.
    6. Nicholas Karachalis, 2021. "Temporary Use as a Participatory Placemaking Tool to Support Cultural Initiatives and Its Connection to City Marketing Strategies—The Case of Athens," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-13, February.
    7. Robin A. Chang, 2021. "How Do Scholars Communicate the ‘Temporary Turn’ in Urban Studies? A Socio-Semiotic Framework," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(1), pages 133-145.
    8. Anja Nygren & Florencia Quesada, 2020. "Imagining Cities of Inclusion—Formulating Spaces of Justice," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(3), pages 200-205.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v:3:y:2018:i:3:p:1-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.