IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/urbpla/v1y2016i2p46-64.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Planning with Citizens: Implementation of an e-Planning Platform and Analysis of Research Needs

Author

Listed:
  • Stefan Steiniger

    (Centro de Desarrollo Urbano Sustentable (CEDEUS), Departamento de Ingeniería Transporte y Logística, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Chile)

  • M. Ebrahim Poorazizi

    (Department of Geomatics Engineering, University of Calgary, Canada)

  • Andrew J. S. Hunter

    (Department of Geomatics Engineering, University of Calgary, Canada and McKenzie and Co Consultants Ltd., Auckland, New Zealand)

Abstract

Citizen participation should be an essential part of an urban planning process if the needs of the local population are to be addressed. Citizen participation should also improve acceptance of private construction projects by residents that live in or near such development. A complementary form of citizen participation to public planning meetings is to permit citizen engagement via Web 2.0 technologies, which also has the potential to get citizens involved that are usually difficult to reach. We aim to build a social, i.e. participatory, planning platform that allows technology savvy citizens to inform themselves of future and ongoing development projects and to also discuss them online. In this work we discuss the functional needs and context-of-use constraints of such an e-planning platform. A conceptual model of the technical architecture is outlined and a prototype implementation is presented. This prototype is built on free and open source software components, including a social network, to enable platform adoption in other locations. Finally, we discuss the research needs that are to be addressed if the development of participatory e-planning platforms should advance.

Suggested Citation

  • Stefan Steiniger & M. Ebrahim Poorazizi & Andrew J. S. Hunter, 2016. "Planning with Citizens: Implementation of an e-Planning Platform and Analysis of Research Needs," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 1(2), pages 46-64.
    • Handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v:1:y:2016:i:2:p:46-64
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/607
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anna Reid & Peter Petocz & Paul Taylor, 2009. "Business Students’ Conceptions of Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 1(3), pages 1-12, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ajit Singh & Gabriela Christmann, 2020. "Citizen Participation in Digitised Environments in Berlin: Visualising Spatial Knowledge in Urban Planning," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(2), pages 71-83.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liwen Chen & Tung-Liang Chen, 2018. "International Students’ Conceptions of the Sustainable Internationalization of Business Education in Taiwan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-12, November.
    2. Anna Sundermann & Daniel Fischer, 2019. "How Does Sustainability Become Professionally Relevant? Exploring the Role of Sustainability Conceptions in First Year Students," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1, September.
    3. Audrey L. Schroer & Heili E. Lowman & Craig L. Just, 2015. "Educating the Aware, Informed and Action-Oriented Sustainable Citizen," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-15, February.
    4. Anna Oberrauch & Helga Mayr & Ivan Nikitin & Tanja Bügler & Thorsten Kosler & Christian Vollmer, 2021. "“I Wanted a Profession That Makes a Difference”—An Online Survey of First-Year Students’ Study Choice Motives and Sustainability-Related Attributes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-28, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v:1:y:2016:i:2:p:46-64. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.