IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/socinc/v8y2020i3p54-65.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Inclusive Social Lettings Practice: Opportunities to Enhance Independent Living for Disabled People

Author

Listed:
  • Isobel Anderson

    (Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, Scotland)

  • Dianne-Dominique Theakstone

    (Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, Scotland)

  • Julia Lawrence

    (Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, Scotland)

Abstract

Appropriate housing is a key element of independent living for disabled people, yet research evidence confirms the continuing, often negative, impact of unsuitable housing on their lives. This article examines access to social rented housing as a route to independent living, through a study of lettings practice for accessible and adapted homes. Drawing on the social and social-relational models of disability, the study adopted a disabled-led, co-production approach. Qualitative research methods were used to compare social landlord practice and track home seeker/tenant experiences. While housing providers were proactive in reviewing policy and practice to better meet the housing needs of disabled people, there remained some ‘distance’ between landlord goals and applicant experiences. Disabled people’s extended lived experience of inappropriate housing, while waiting for a more accessible home, impacted negatively on their quality of life and physical and mental health. Social lettings policies and practice were necessarily complex, but often difficult for applicants to understand. The complexity of disabled people’s housing needs meant that the matching process for suitable housing was also complex, often requiring individualised solutions. Recommendations to improve practice include making better use of technology to improve data on accessible/adapted properties and applicant needs; flexibility in lettings practice to facilitate effective matches; and flexibility in fully recognising disabled people’s housing and independent living needs. Social rented housing remains an important mechanism for achieving disabled people’s independence. Explicit recognition of the social-relational interpretation of disability could deliver more inclusive lettings practice and achieve more sustainable tenancies.

Suggested Citation

  • Isobel Anderson & Dianne-Dominique Theakstone & Julia Lawrence, 2020. "Inclusive Social Lettings Practice: Opportunities to Enhance Independent Living for Disabled People," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(3), pages 54-65.
  • Handle: RePEc:cog:socinc:v:8:y:2020:i:3:p:54-65
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/2957
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Delia Ferri, 2018. "Reasonable Accommodation as a Gateway to the Equal Enjoyment of Human Rights: From New York to Strasbourg," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(1), pages 40-50.
    2. Peter Mackie, 2012. "Housing Pathways of Disabled Young People: Evidence for Policy and Practice," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(6), pages 805-821.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Isobel Anderson & Joe Finnerty & Vikki McCall, 2020. "Home, Housing and Communities: Foundations for Inclusive Society," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(3), pages 1-4.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anna Clarke, 2016. "The Prevalence of Rough Sleeping and Sofa Surfing Amongst Young People in the UK," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(4), pages 60-72.
    2. Irene Belperio & Fiona Rillotta & Tim Adam & Ruth Walker & Claire Hutchinson, 2024. "Using Inclusive Research Methods and the Housing Pathways Framework in Future Planning and Housing Research: A Pilot Study," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-15, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:socinc:v:8:y:2020:i:3:p:54-65. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.