IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/socinc/v3y2015i1p76-87.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Recognising Effective Legal Protection to People Smuggled at Sea, by Reviewing the EU Legal Framework on Human Trafficking and Solidarity between Member States

Author

Listed:
  • Matilde Ventrella

    (School of Law, University of Wolverhampton, WV1 1LY, Wolverhampton, UK)

Abstract

The death toll of migrants at sea is on the increase. The EU and its Member States are not addressing the situation by widening the EU legal framework on human trafficking to persons smuggled at sea. People smuggled at sea are extremely vulnerable at the hands of their smugglers and suffer serious abuse of their human rights from their journeys through the desert, on the boats and when they reach their final destination. They become victims of human trafficking and they should not be neglected anymore by the EU and its Member States. However, all EU proposals lack of concreteness as Member States do not want to support and host migrants at sea on their territories. They are reluctant to launch solidarity between each other as requested by the Lisbon Treaty and by doing this, they are indirectly responsible for the death of many migrants at sea and for the abuse of their human rights. This article proposes alternatives to explore that could change the situation if Member States show their willingness to cooperate with each other.

Suggested Citation

  • Matilde Ventrella, 2015. "Recognising Effective Legal Protection to People Smuggled at Sea, by Reviewing the EU Legal Framework on Human Trafficking and Solidarity between Member States," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 3(1), pages 76-87.
    • Handle: RePEc:cog:socinc:v:3:y:2015:i:1:p:76-87
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/170
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anonymous, 1963. "Council of Europe," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 17(3), pages 820-822, July.
    2. Anonymous, 1963. "Council of Europe," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 17(1), pages 288-293, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Harald Bauder, 2021. "Urban migrant and refugee solidarity beyond city limits," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(16), pages 3213-3229, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:ces:ifodic:v:15:y:2017:i:3:p:50000000000051 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Rey Koslowski, 1994. "Intra‐EU Migration, Citizenship and Political Union," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(3), pages 369-402, September.
    3. Joseph Rikhof & Ashley Geerts, 2019. "Protected Groups in Refugee Law and International Law," Laws, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-47, October.
    4. Karen Teske-Gallagher & Yvonne Giesing, 2017. "Dual Citzenship in the EU," ifo DICE Report, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 15(03), pages 43-47, October.
    5. Kochenov, Dimitry, 2005. "EU Enlargement Law: History and Recent Developments: Treaty Custom Concubinage?," European Integration online Papers (EIoP), European Community Studies Association Austria (ECSA-A), vol. 9, April.
    6. Matilde Ventrella, 2017. "Identifying Victims of Human Trafficking at Hotspots by Focusing on People Smuggled to Europe," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(2), pages 69-80.
    7. Braams, Beate, 2007. "Equal Opportunities between Men and Women and Gender Mainstreaming under the European Employment Strategy (EES) and the Open Method of Coordination (OMC) – A New Policy Approach to Combat Gender Discr," European Integration online Papers (EIoP), European Community Studies Association Austria (ECSA-A), vol. 11, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:socinc:v:3:y:2015:i:1:p:76-87. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.