IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/socinc/v11y2023i4p160-171.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Circulatory Loop: The Reciprocal Relationship of Organizations, Digitalization, and Gender

Author

Listed:
  • Lene Baumgart

    (Chair of Sociology of Organization and Administration, University of Potsdam, Germany)

  • Pauline Boos

    (Chair of Sociology of Organization and Administration, University of Potsdam, Germany)

  • Katharina Braunsmann

    (Chair of Sociology of Digital Societies, Leibniz University Hannover, Germany)

Abstract

In the digitalization debate, gender biases in digital technologies play a significant role because of their potential for social exclusion and inequality. It is therefore remarkable that organizations as drivers of digitalization and as places for social integration have been widely overlooked so far. Simultaneously, gender biases and digitalization have structurally immanent connections to organizations. Therefore, a look at the reciprocal relationship between organizations, digitalization, and gender is needed. The article provides answers to the question of whether and how organizations (re)produce, reinforce, or diminish gender‐specific inequalities during their digital transformations. On the one hand, gender inequalities emerge when organizations use post‐bureaucratic concepts through digitalization. On the other hand, gender inequalities are reproduced when organizations either program or implement digital technologies and fail to establish control structures that prevent gender biases. This article shows that digitalization can act as a catalyst for inequality‐producing mechanisms, but also has the potential to mitigate inequalities. We argue that organizations must be considered when discussing the potential of exclusion through digitalization.

Suggested Citation

  • Lene Baumgart & Pauline Boos & Katharina Braunsmann, 2023. "A Circulatory Loop: The Reciprocal Relationship of Organizations, Digitalization, and Gender," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 11(4), pages 160-171.
  • Handle: RePEc:cog:socinc:v:11:y:2023:i:4:p:160-171
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/7056
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:socinc:v:11:y:2023:i:4:p:160-171. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.