IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/socinc/v11y2023i3p251-270.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Examining Aspects of Digital Inclusion Among National Samples of US Older Adults

Author

Listed:
  • Amy M. Schuster

    (Department of Sociology, Anthropology and Criminal Justice, Clemson University, USA)

  • Shelia R. Cotten

    (Department of Sociology, Anthropology and Criminal Justice, Clemson University, USA)

Abstract

We live in a world where we are constantly connected to devices (e.g., smartphones, computers, tablets) and are encouraged to go online to find information about most things in society. This constant digital connection provides the means whereby many individuals communicate and exchange social support. For most demographic groups, this results in being online and connected to devices multiple times each day. Older adults have been slower to adopt and use emerging information and communication technologies (ICTs). Their digital divide in comparison to other age groups may not be an accurate representation of their technology use and the reasons for this use. This descriptive study examines this view of digital inclusion by focusing on older adults and their uses of technology. We provide an overview of technology usage by different older adult age groups in the United States using existing national‐level data. We utilize life course and aging theoretical perspectives to help articulate how older adults use a wide variety of ICTs and whether they are constantly connected, and we note that while a constant connection to devices may be normative for younger age groups, this may not, and perhaps should not, be the case for older adults. The article concludes with a discussion of the social construction of digital inclusion and emphasizes the significant variation that exists in this construct, measurement of technology use in large‐scale datasets, and variation in technology use across older adult life course groups.

Suggested Citation

  • Amy M. Schuster & Shelia R. Cotten, 2023. "Examining Aspects of Digital Inclusion Among National Samples of US Older Adults," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 11(3), pages 251-270.
    • Handle: RePEc:cog:socinc:v:11:y:2023:i:3:p:251-270
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/6890
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shelia R. Cotten & Melinda Goldner & Timothy M. Hale & Patricia Drentea, 2011. "The Importance of Type, Amount, and Timing of Internet Use for Understanding Psychological Distress," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 92(1), pages 119-139, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hongmei Tong & Yu Lung & Shen (Lamson) Lin & Karen M Kobayashi & Karen M Davison & Senyo Agbeyaka & Esme Fuller-Thomson, 2021. "Refugee status is associated with double the odds of psychological distress in mid-to-late life: Findings from the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 67(6), pages 747-760, September.
    2. Peng Nie & Alfonso Sousa-Poza & Galit Nimrod, 2017. "Internet Use and Subjective Well-Being in China," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 132(1), pages 489-516, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:socinc:v:11:y:2023:i:3:p:251-270. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.