IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/poango/v11y2023i1p085-96.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Parliamentary Women Opposition Leaders: A Comparative Assessment Across 28 OECD Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Sarah C. Dingler

    (Department of Political Science, University of Innsbruck, Austria)

  • Ludger Helms

    (Department of Political Science, University of Innsbruck, Austria)

Abstract

While women have increasingly gained access to the position of opposition leader, we still know very little about their pathways to that office. Therefore, this article seeks to uncover the dynamics and patterns that distinguish the ascendency of women politicians to the office of opposition leader from a comparative perspective. In this article, opposition leaders are understood as the parliamentary party group leaders of the largest non-governing party in a given legislative assembly, which marks the closest equivalent to the Westminster understanding of leaders of the opposition that continues to dominate international notions of opposition leaders and oppositional leadership in parliamentary democracies. We draw on data from opposition leaders in 28 parliamentary democracies between 1996–2020 to identify opportunity structures that allow women opposition leaders to emerge across countries. In addition, we test how factors on the individual level (e.g., previous experience in party and parliament as well as in government) and at the party level (e.g., ideology) affect the likelihood that a parliamentary opposition leader is a woman. Our analyses demonstrate that the share of women in parliament significantly increases the likelihood that at least one of the parliamentary opposition leaders of the past 25 years was a woman. Moreover, opposition leaders in leftist parties are more likely to be women than their more rightist counterparts. Surprisingly, and contrary to our expectations, previous political experience does not shape the probability of women becoming opposition leaders. Thus, overall, the institutional and ideological contexts of selecting parliamentary opposition leaders seem to matter more than the experience and qualifications of individual candidates.

Suggested Citation

  • Sarah C. Dingler & Ludger Helms, 2023. "Parliamentary Women Opposition Leaders: A Comparative Assessment Across 28 OECD Countries," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 11(1), pages 085-96.
  • Handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v:11:y:2023:i:1:p:085-96
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/6176
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Claire Annesley & Francesca Gains, 2010. "The Core Executive: Gender, Power and Change," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 58(5), pages 909-929, December.
    2. Claire Annesley & Francesca Gains, 2010. "The Core Executive: Gender, Power and Change," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 58, pages 909-929, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sarah C. Dingler & Ludger Helms & Henriette Müller, 2023. "Women Opposition Leaders: Conceptual Issues and Empirical Agendas," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 11(1), pages 080-84.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Björk, Lisa & Härenstam, Annika, 2016. "Differences in organizational preconditions for managers in genderized municipal services," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 209-219.
    2. Blome, Agnes & Fuchs, Gesine, 2017. "Macht und substantielle Repräsentation von Frauen," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 26(1), pages 55-69.
    3. Anne Marie Goetz & Rob Jenkins, 2018. "Feminist Activism and the Politics of Reform: When and Why Do States Respond to Demands for Gender Equality Policies?," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 49(3), pages 714-734, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v:11:y:2023:i:1:p:085-96. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.