IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/meanco/v4y2016i1p39-50.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Internet Censorship Circumvention Tools: Escaping the Control of the Syrian Regime

Author

Listed:
  • Walid Al-Saqaf

    (Department of Media Studies, Örebro University, Sweden)

Abstract

Studies have shown that authoritarian regimes tend to censor the media to limit potential threats to the status quo. While such censorship practices were traditionally aimed at broadcast and print media, the emergence of the Internet and social media in particular, prompted some authoritarian regimes, such as the Assad regime in Syria, to try and exert a similar level of censorship on the Internet as well. During the Arab Spring, the Syrian regime blocked hundreds of websites that provided social networking, news, and other services. Taking Syria as a case study, this paper examines whether Internet censorship succeeded in preventing Internet users from reaching censored online content during 2010−2012. By analyzing the use of Alkasir, a censorship circumvention tool created by the author, the paper provides empirical evidence demonstrating that users were in fact able to bypass censorship and access blocked websites. The findings demonstrate that censorship circumvention tools constituted a threat to the information control systems of authoritarian regimes, highlighting the potential of such tools to promote online freedom of expression in countries where Internet censorship is prevalent.

Suggested Citation

  • Walid Al-Saqaf, 2016. "Internet Censorship Circumvention Tools: Escaping the Control of the Syrian Regime," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(1), pages 39-50.
  • Handle: RePEc:cog:meanco:v:4:y:2016:i:1:p:39-50
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/357
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rebecca MacKinnon, 2008. "Flatter world and thicker walls? Blogs, censorship and civic discourse in China," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 134(1), pages 31-46, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lijun Tang & Syamantak Bhattacharya, 2011. "Power and Resistance: A Case Study of Satire on the Internet," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 16(2), pages 10-18, June.
    2. Manuel Pedro Rodríguez Bolívar, 2017. "Policy makers’ perceptions on the transformational effect of Web 2.0 technologies on public services delivery," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 227-254, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:meanco:v:4:y:2016:i:1:p:39-50. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.