Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

´Old-New´ Complaint Procedure of the Human Rights Council

Contents:

Author Info

  • Michal Davala

    ()
    (Office of the Government of the Slovak Republic)

Registered author(s):

    Abstract

    The UN Human Rights Council has replaced the Commission on Human Rights in 2006. The complaint procedure used by individual and group of persons to reveal consistent pattern of gross human rights violations, so called the ‘1503 procedure’, was one of the monitoring mechanisms exercised by the Commission. It has been revised and served as a basis for new complaint procedure to address gross violations of all human rights. Changes should ensure that the system will be impartial, objective, efficient, timely and victims-oriented. Have these goals been achieved? Present contribution analyses the structure of the ‘old-new’ procedure, admissibility criteria and the proceeding of the complaint. Especially, new features of the procedure are in the center of attention. Author tries to evaluate changes, their impact on effective human rights monitoring and to describe possible development tendencies.

    Download Info

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
    File URL: http://www.eaco.eu/documents/issue/davala.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    Bibliographic Info

    Article provided by European Association Comenius - EACO in its journal DANUBE: Law and Economics Review.

    Volume (Year): (2011)
    Issue (Month): 3 (September)
    Pages: 47-54

    as in new window
    Handle: RePEc:cmn:journl:y:2011:i:3:p:47-54

    Contact details of provider:
    Web page: http://www.eaco.eu

    Related research

    Keywords: UN Human Rights Council; 1503 Procedure; Complaint Procedure; Gross Human Rights Violations;

    References

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    Citations

    Lists

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cmn:journl:y:2011:i:3:p:47-54. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Zuzana Machova).

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.