IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cmj/seapas/y2018i18p379-386.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cost-Benefit Analysis Methodology For Investments In Refractive Surgery

Author

Listed:
  • Oana Ramona LOBONȚ

    (Victor Babes University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timisoara)

  • Roxana BUCUREAN

    (Victor Babes University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timisoara)

Abstract

The current paper proposes a methodology of cost – benefit analysis for investments in the field of refractive surgery over the Romanian-Serbian cross-border region. While refractive surgery services have the potential of generating financial gains for the investor, they can also generate significant social impact. When the investments are made from public funds, the net social benefits are usually targeted. Although the potential impact of such an investment over the quality of life of the local population is important, a feasibility study is mandatory as a basis for the decision to allocate the necessary funds. Through a previous research, we established a benchmark for the conversion of the net social benefits of refractive surgery into monetary form. Through the current article, we propose a way of integrating the converted net social benefits into a cost – benefit analysis. The proposed methodology can be used in feasibility studies over the Romanian-Serbian cross-border region and can easily be adapted to other regions.

Suggested Citation

  • Oana Ramona LOBONȚ & Roxana BUCUREAN, 2018. "Cost-Benefit Analysis Methodology For Investments In Refractive Surgery," SEA - Practical Application of Science, Romanian Foundation for Business Intelligence, Editorial Department, issue 18, pages 379-386, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:cmj:seapas:y:2018:i:18:p:379-386
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://seaopenresearch.eu/Journals/articles/SPAS_18_21.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dan ARMEANU & Adrian ENCIU & Dorina POANTA, 2011. "Characteristics of Criteria for Selecting Investment Projects under Uncertainty," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania - AGER, vol. 0(7(560)), pages 5-18, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cmj:seapas:y:2018:i:18:p:379-386. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Serghie Dan (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://seaopenresearch.eu/ .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.