IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/clh/resear/v16y2023i26.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Canadian Northern Corridor Roundtable Program: Results and Lessons Learned

Author

Listed:
  • Katharina Koch

    (University of Calgary)

  • Emily Galley

    (University of Calgary)

  • Evgeniia (Jen) Sidorova

    (University of Calgary)

  • G. Kent Fellows

    (University of Calgary)

  • Robert Mansell

    (University of Calgary)

Abstract

The Canadian Northern Corridor (CNC) Research Program is an investigation of the feasibility, desirability and acceptability of the corridor concept in advancing integrated, long-term infrastructure planning and development in Canada. The concept involves a series of multi-modal rights-of-way across mid- and northern Canada to provide space for efficient, timely and integrated development of infrastructure, including combinations of road, rail, transmission, pipeline, communications, port and airport infrastructure. While there is no final CNC routing, the notional corridor reaches across Canada’s mid- and northern regions, connecting all three coasts and creating interlinkages with the existing southern transportation corridors. These would be expected to make public and private infrastructure investments more attractive by reducing approval costs and uncertainties, sharing costs associated with establishing and administering rights-of-way, decreasing environmental footprints and, in general, moving to a more strategic, integrated and long-term approach to infrastructure planning and development. Overall, a CNC could potentially expand and diversify Canada’s international and national trade opportunities, increase Canada’s overall income and employment growth, support development and living standards for Indigenous, mid- and northern Canadian communities, and assist with Canada’s northern security and sovereignty goals.

Suggested Citation

  • Katharina Koch & Emily Galley & Evgeniia (Jen) Sidorova & G. Kent Fellows & Robert Mansell, 2023. "The Canadian Northern Corridor Roundtable Program: Results and Lessons Learned," SPP Research Papers, The School of Public Policy, University of Calgary, vol. 16(26), August.
  • Handle: RePEc:clh:resear:v:16:y:2023:i:26
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.policyschool.ca/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/NC-E7.RountableResults.Koch_.et_.al_.Aug28.r2.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cherie Metcalf, 2023. "Indigenous Land Ownership and Title in Canada: Implications for a Northern Corridor," SPP Research Papers, The School of Public Policy, University of Calgary, vol. 16(7), March.
    2. G. Kent Fellows & Trevor Tombe, 2018. "Gains from Trade for Canada’s North: The Case for a Northern Infrastructure Corridor," SPP Communique, The School of Public Policy, University of Calgary, vol. 10(2), March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jean-Paul Rodrigue, 2021. "Constraints in the Canadian Transport Infrastructure Grid," SPP Research Papers, The School of Public Policy, University of Calgary, vol. 14(6), February.
    2. Shirley Thompson & Stewart Hill & Annette Salles & Tanzim Ahmed & Ajarat Adegun & Uche Nwankwo, 2023. "The Northern Corridor, Food Insecurity and the Resource Curse for Indigenous Communities in Canada," SPP Research Papers, The School of Public Policy, University of Calgary, vol. 16(20), June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:clh:resear:v:16:y:2023:i:26. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bev Dahlby (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/spcalca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.