IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/clh/resear/v15y2022i2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Innovation in the United States Health-Care System’s Organization and Delivery

Author

Listed:
  • Michael J. DiStefano

    (Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health)

  • So-Yeon Kang

    (Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health)

  • Mariana P. Socal

    (Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health)

  • Gerard Anderson

    (Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health)

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has had a galvanizing effect on policy-makers in the U.S. who are trying and testing innovations in delivering government-insured health care that Canada would be wise to take note of and learn from. As in Canada, the federal government in the U.S. is limited in how directly it can influence health-care delivery, even within programs such as Medicare and Medicaid that receive federal funding. However, it has used its significant funding power to offer states incentives to promote federal priorities. As a result, dozens of states have expanded eligibility and benefits in line with federal priorities in exchange for additional funding. The U.S. government has also encouraged states to experiment with innovative delivery or financing approaches within Medicaid by offering temporary, extendable waivers that exempt novel concepts from meeting all Medicaid requirements. This has allowed states to try new programs that target the expansion of benefits coverage. One waiver-based program, for example, allows elderly individuals to employ friends and relatives as home caregivers as an alternative to institutionalization. Digital-health initiatives have also been accelerated in the U.S. during the pandemic, including loosening restrictions to allow telehealth visits and “hospital-at-home†programs, which allow acutecare and post-acute care patients to convalesce in their own residences through remote monitoring and drug delivery. Recent payment reforms in the U.S., meanwhile, include allowing health-care providers to voluntarily band together to share medical and financial responsibility for providing quality, co-ordinated care with lower costs, resulting in notable savings. Episode-based, bundled payments for complete courses of therapy for certain conditions have lowered some costs with equal or better quality of care. Other promising payment-reform initiatives involve managed care programs with private sector participation in care and insurance offering bundles of benefits not provided by traditional government coverage. The health-care challenges experienced during the pandemic have also prompted the U.S. government to take a more active role in promoting more resilient supply chains for drugs and medical equipment, to reduce dependence on offshore manufacturers and introduce more transparency into the drug supply chain. It is also providing funds for training grants and student-loan repayment relief for health-care workers, to help ensure there are enough professionals being trained for the health-care workforce now and into the future. These efforts demonstrate how health policy-makers in the U.S., in light of the COVID-19 pandemic, are driven by innovation in navigating the trade-offs between delivering quality care, expanding care, controlling costs, and allowing for regional autonomy. These considerations are not unlike those faced by Canadian policy-makers, who can learn from American innovations to help Canada emerge from the pandemic with a stronger health-care system.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael J. DiStefano & So-Yeon Kang & Mariana P. Socal & Gerard Anderson, 2022. "Innovation in the United States Health-Care System’s Organization and Delivery," SPP Research Papers, The School of Public Policy, University of Calgary, vol. 15(2), January.
  • Handle: RePEc:clh:resear:v:15:y:2022:i:2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.policyschool.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/HC8_US-Health-Care_DiStefano-et-al.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jonathan Gruber & Benjamin D. Sommers, 2020. "Fiscal Federalism and the Budget Impacts of the Affordable Care Act's Medicaid Expansion," NBER Working Papers 26862, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jonathan Gruber & Johanna Catherine Maclean & Bill Wright & Eric Wilkinson & Kevin G. Volpp, 2020. "The effect of increased cost‐sharing on low‐value service use," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(10), pages 1180-1201, October.
    2. Gicheva, Dora & Anand, Priyanka, 2020. "The Impact of the ACA Medicaid Expansions on the Employment and Academic Progress of College Students," UNCG Economics Working Papers 20-3, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Department of Economics.
    3. Petra Gram Cavalca & Mette Ejrnæs & Mette Gørtz, 2022. "Trading off fiscal budget adherence and child protection," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(3), pages 1-15, March.
    4. Stefano DellaVigna & Woojin Kim, 2022. "Policy Diffusion and Polarization across U.S. States," NBER Working Papers 30142, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:clh:resear:v:15:y:2022:i:2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bev Dahlby (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/spcalca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.