IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ces/ifosdt/v73y2020i01p45-50.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Compromise on the Basic Pension – Does It Meet Expectations?

Author

Listed:
  • Johannes Blum
  • Raphael de Britto Schiller
  • Niklas Potrafke
  • Joachim Ragnitz
  • Martin Werding

Abstract

Results from the Economists Panel In November 2019, after long discussions, Germany’s grand coalition agreed on a compromise on the basic pension. The 26th ifo and FAZ Economists Panel focused on the planned basic pension. Many of the economists interviewed are critical of the new basic pension, which is designed to increase old-age pension provision.

Suggested Citation

  • Johannes Blum & Raphael de Britto Schiller & Niklas Potrafke & Joachim Ragnitz & Martin Werding, 2020. "The Compromise on the Basic Pension – Does It Meet Expectations?," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 73(01), pages 45-50, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:ces:ifosdt:v:73:y:2020:i:01:p:45-50
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ifo.de/DocDL/sd-2020-01-blum-etal-oekonomenpanel-grundrente-2020-01-22.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Florian Dorn & Benedikt Kauf & Manuela Krause & Niklas Potrafke, 2016. "Old Age Provision and State Pensions – How Sustainable Are They?," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 69(17), pages 44-48, September.
    2. Johannes Blum & Anna Dudel & Manuela Krause & Niklas Potrafke, 2018. "The Future of the Pension System in Germany," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 71(22), pages 47-53, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Joachim Ragnitz, 2020. "The Coalition Compromise on the Basic Pension: Well Meant, Badly Done," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 73(03), pages 48-52, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Johannes Blum & Anna Dudel & Manuela Krause & Niklas Potrafke, 2018. "The Future of the Pension System in Germany," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 71(22), pages 47-53, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ces:ifosdt:v:73:y:2020:i:01:p:45-50. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klaus Wohlrabe (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifooode.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.