IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ces/ifosdt/v73y2020i01p34-39.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Out with the Soli, In with a New, Transparent, and Flexible Income Tax Rate

Author

Listed:
  • Eckart Bomsdorf

Abstract

With a Higher Basic Allowance and a Higher Maximum Marginal Tax Rate Eckart Bomsdorf proposes a new, transparent, and flexible income tax rate that would also do away with the solidarity surcharge on particularly high incomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Eckart Bomsdorf, 2020. "Out with the Soli, In with a New, Transparent, and Flexible Income Tax Rate," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 73(01), pages 34-39, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:ces:ifosdt:v:73:y:2020:i:01:p:34-39
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ifo.de/DocDL/sd-2020-01-bomsdorf-einkommensteuer-2020-01-22.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maximilian Joseph Blömer & Luisa Dörr & Clemens Fuest & Martin Mosler & Andreas Peichl & Niklas Potrafke, 2019. "Was bei einer Reform des Solidaritätszuschlags zu beachten ist," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 72(16), August.
    2. Stefan Bach, 2018. "Solidaritätszuschlag bei Hochverdienenden in den Einkommensteuertarif integrieren," DIW aktuell 18, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    3. Stefan Bach, 2018. "Solidaritätszuschlag bei Hochverdienenden erhalten und in den Einkommensteuertarif integrieren: Kommentar," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 85(46), pages 1000-1000.
    4. Bomsdorf, Eckart, 1996. "Ein alternativer Vorschlag zur Neufassung des Einkommensteuertarifs," Wirtschaftsdienst – Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftspolitik (1949 - 2007), ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 76(12), pages 623-627.
    5. Gregor Schlick, 2013. "Grundfreibetrag und Einkommensteuertarif — eine Trennung ist möglich," Wirtschaftsdienst, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 93(12), pages 841-845, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dieter Dziadkowski, 2020. "Plea and Proposal for a Constitutional and Transparent Income Tax Rate - Notes on 25 Years of Theses of the Income Tax Commission," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 73(01), pages 30-33, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maximilian Joseph Blömer & Andreas Peichl, 2020. "The ifo Tax and Transfer Behavioral Microsimulation Model," ifo Working Paper Series 335, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich.
    2. Christhart Bork & Klaus Müller, 1998. "Verbreiterte Bemessungsgrundlage und Tarifsenkungspotential im deutschen Einkommensteuerrecht," Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung / Quarterly Journal of Economic Research, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 67(3), pages 189-208.
    3. Schröder Carsten & König Johannes & Fedorets Alexandra & Goebel Jan & Grabka Markus M. & Lüthen Holger & Metzing Maria & Schikora Felicitas & Liebig Stefan, 2020. "The economic research potentials of the German Socio-Economic Panel study," German Economic Review, De Gruyter, vol. 21(3), pages 335-371, September.
    4. Maximilian Joseph Blömer & Andreas Peichl, 2020. "Who Has an Incentive to Work? Participation Tax Rates of the German Tax-Transfer System," ifo Forschungsberichte, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, number 118.
    5. Maximilian Joseph Blömer & Luisa Dörr & Clemens Fuest & Martin Mosler & Andreas Peichl & Niklas Potrafke, 2019. "Was bei einer Reform des Solidaritätszuschlags zu beachten ist," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 72(16), August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ces:ifosdt:v:73:y:2020:i:01:p:34-39. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klaus Wohlrabe (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifooode.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.