IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ces/ifosdt/v68y2015i09p03-15.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is Germany the Euro Winner?

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Stelter
  • Karlhans Sauernheimer
  • Klaus C. Engelen

Abstract

Has the introduction of the euro led to an improvement or to a decline in German prosperity? Daniel Stelter, founder of the discussion forum “Beyond the Obvious” and consultant, comes to the conclusion that the euro has led to a decline in German prosperity and eroded its long-term competitiveness; and presents ten arguments to support his view. In his opinion, the story for the “average German citizen” runs something like this: the introduction of the euro led to a long phase of slow growth, high unemployment and wage stagnation. The state reduced its expenditure on social services, infrastructure and investments. Companies had to focus on exports and their savings were used to grant suppliers credit. Now that these loans cannot be repaid, German savers and taxpayers have to cover the damages. Without the euro the debt party in southern Europe would never have happened, but the large export surpluses would not have accumulated either. But Germany would have enjoyed higher living standards and better infrastructure. In the opinion of Karlhans Sauernheimer, University of Mainz, exporters in Germany, the owners of exporting companies and their employees benefitted from the introduction of the euro. The losers are German residents, consumers, producers and employees, who have to pay higher import prices than if there were real exchange rates in line with market requirements. A second redistribution channel flows from employees to capital holders. Excessively high exports/ extremely low investments are tantamount to capital export. Domestic capital reserves are lower as a result, while the labour demand created by the deployment of such capital falls. Real wages and employment decline, while returns on capital rise. A third redistribution channel flows between the “debtor state and private household creditors”. The German Finance Minister is the interest rate winner and German savers are the interest rate losers. In all of these cases “Germany” is not the euro winner: some Germans are winners and others are losers. Klaus C. Engelen, a business journalist, also does not see Germany on the winners’ bench. The Eurozone is running the danger of becoming a community of economic weaklings. Those economies still able to perform are obliged to justify themselves and will be called upon by the majority and by the EU Commission to do more to curb their high performance and pursue a more expansive expenditure policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel Stelter & Karlhans Sauernheimer & Klaus C. Engelen, 2015. "Is Germany the Euro Winner?," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 68(09), pages 03-15, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:ces:ifosdt:v:68:y:2015:i:09:p:03-15
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ifo.de/DocDL/ifosd_2015_09_1.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • F34 - International Economics - - International Finance - - - International Lending and Debt Problems
    • H63 - Public Economics - - National Budget, Deficit, and Debt - - - Debt; Debt Management; Sovereign Debt
    • G01 - Financial Economics - - General - - - Financial Crises

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ces:ifosdt:v:68:y:2015:i:09:p:03-15. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klaus Wohlrabe (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifooode.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.