IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ces/ifosdt/v62y2009i24p03-16.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How should the afflicted banks be re-capitalised?

Author

Listed:
  • Ulrich van Suntum
  • Cordelius Ilgmann
  • Wolfgang Hönig
  • Stephan Götzl

Abstract

The financial crisis has shown that the capital reserves of many banks were too small. Ulrich van Suntum and Cordelius Ilgmann, University of Münster, point out that the capital banks have on their balance sheets, both in the euro area and the US, is now even greater than before the financial crisis. But this is no cause for an "all clear" signal since the capital reserve ratios before the crisis proved to be too small to prevent systemic breakdowns. The flaw of the German bad-bank model is that participation is voluntary and that banks have shown little interest in this model. Instead, with regard to the bad-bank solution one should turn to the already used instrument in Germany of equalisation claims. In the opinion of Wolfgang Hönig, formerly of Commerzbank AG, Frankfurt, one necessity is to improve the quality of the rating agencies. Another is that the state should subject the system-relevant German banks to stress tests to see if they need to be or are capable of being restructured. The B banks identified in this process should then be officially restructured. This should not be left to the discretion of the banking officials. Also Stephan Götzl, GVB (Genossenschaftsverband Bayern), would like to obligate the afflicted banks to take on state aid. In the future, the framework conditions should be set such that that the banks cannot become too "systemic" - i.e., too large, complex, opaque or international - to be allowed to go bankrupt. It must be possible for a bank to exit the market.

Suggested Citation

  • Ulrich van Suntum & Cordelius Ilgmann & Wolfgang Hönig & Stephan Götzl, 2009. "How should the afflicted banks be re-capitalised?," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 62(24), pages 03-16, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:ces:ifosdt:v:62:y:2009:i:24:p:03-16
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ifo.de/DocDL/ifosd_2009_24_1.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Projektgruppe Gemeinschaftsdiagnose, 2009. "Zögerliche Belebung – steigende Staatsschulden: Gemeinschaftsdiagnose Herbst 2009," Wirtschaft im Wandel, Halle Institute for Economic Research (IWH), vol. 15(2. Sonder), pages 1-79.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Katarzyna Kaminska, 2016. "Institutional and legal conditions for the German stabilization policy during the economic crisis 2008–2009," Ekonomia i Prawo, Uniwersytet Mikolaja Kopernika, vol. 15(4), pages 469-480, December.
    2. Projektgruppe Gemeinschaftsdiagnose, 2011. "Joint Economic Forecast Spring 2011: Upswing continues - European Debt Crisis still Unresolved," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 64(08), pages 03-63, April.
    3. repec:ilo:ilowps:484519 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Projektgruppe Gemeinschaftsdiagnose, 2010. "Economic Upswing in Germany - Major Decisions Facing Economic Policy," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 63(20), pages 03-61, October.
    5. Hans Fehr & Wolfgang Scherf & Michael Eilfort & Guido Raddatz, 2009. "Budget consolidation: Should reversing new government borrowing be started only after the crisis has been overcome?," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 62(21), pages 03-12, November.
    6. Eicker-Wolf, Kai. & Truger, Achim., 2014. "Demystifying a "shining example" : German public finances under the debt brake," ILO Working Papers 994845193402676, International Labour Organization.
    7. Projektgruppe Gemeinschaftsdiagnose, 2010. "The Recovery Continues - Considerable Risks Remain," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 63(08), pages 03-78, April.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • G21 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Banks; Other Depository Institutions; Micro Finance Institutions; Mortgages

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ces:ifosdt:v:62:y:2009:i:24:p:03-16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klaus Wohlrabe (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifooode.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.