IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ces/ifofor/v22y2021i04p31-37.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Important are Pocketbook Voting, Social Preferences and Expressive Motives in Referenda?

Author

Listed:
  • Johannes Meya
  • Panu Poutvaara
  • Robert Schwager

Abstract

Economic models on voting usually assume that voters maximize their own material interests. Yet there is convincing evidence that people also tend to care about fairness and the common good. Furthermore, some voters may derive utility from the act of voting in a certain way, independent of whether their vote affects the actual outcome. To evaluate the importance of these motives, we studied voting in student referenda on whether to collectively purchase a public good, such as a regional train ticket. Most students voted in line with their pocketbook interests and reported that their own willingness to pay was more important in their vote choice than others’ willingness to pay.

Suggested Citation

  • Johannes Meya & Panu Poutvaara & Robert Schwager, 2021. "How Important are Pocketbook Voting, Social Preferences and Expressive Motives in Referenda?," CESifo Forum, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 22(04), pages 31-37, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:ces:ifofor:v:22:y:2021:i:04:p:31-37
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cesifo.org/DocDL/CESifo-forum-2021-4-meya-etal-How-Important-are-Pocketbook-Voting%2C-Social-Preferences-and-Expressive-Motives-in-Referenda.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ces:ifofor:v:22:y:2021:i:04:p:31-37. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klaus Wohlrabe (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifooode.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.