IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ces/ifodre/v27y2020i02p18-20.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Federal Government Basic Pension Plans: There Are Better Solutions

Author

Listed:
  • Joachim Ragnitz

Abstract

If nothing else goes wrong, the basic pension will start being paid on January 1, 2021. In reality, there is nothing really good about the grand coalition’s compromise on basic pension that has now been agreed. It does not help prevent poverty in old age because important causes of low pension income are not taken into account. Those who are really in need receive a basic pension, but this does not change their total income because it is offset against the basic security benefits. At the same time, the planned income test is so lax that many pensioners with high other incomes would profit. The basic principle of the statutory pension insurance system – the equivalence between contributions paid and pension entitlements – is being abolished. These shortcomings could be accepted if the basic pension were truly oriented towards the goal of preventing poverty in old age and socially justified in terms of neediness of recipients. But it is not, meaning that the government’s basic pension plans can indeed be described as “unconstitutional, inefficient, and unjust.”

Suggested Citation

  • Joachim Ragnitz, 2020. "Federal Government Basic Pension Plans: There Are Better Solutions," ifo Dresden berichtet, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 27(02), pages 18-20, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:ces:ifodre:v:27:y:2020:i:02:p:18-20
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ifo.de/DocDL/ifoDD_20-02_18-20_Ragnitz.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Franz Ruland, 2019. "Vorschlag zur Grundrente: ungerecht, ineffizient und teuer [Basic Pension Proposal: Unfair, Inefficient and Expensive]," Wirtschaftsdienst, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 99(3), pages 189-195, March.
    2. Tim Köhler-Rama & Franz Ruland, 2019. "Vorschlag zur Grundrente: ungerecht, ineffizient und teuer — Replik und Erwiderung [Proposal on Basic Pension: Unfair, Inefficient and Expensive — Reply and Response]," Wirtschaftsdienst, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 99(6), pages 432-439, June.
    3. Joachim Ragnitz, 2020. "The Coalition Compromise on the Basic Pension: Well Meant, Badly Done," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 73(03), pages 48-52, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Joachim Ragnitz, 2020. "The Coalition Compromise on the Basic Pension: Well Meant, Badly Done," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 73(03), pages 48-52, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ces:ifodre:v:27:y:2020:i:02:p:18-20. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klaus Wohlrabe (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifooode.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.