This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Le financement des entités fédérées : état des lieux à la veille d'une future réforme ?

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Benoît Bayenet
Giuseppe Pagano
Aurélien Accaputo
Abstract

A new institutional reform is one of the major stakes for the Belgian citizens and enterprises ahead of the regional election of June 2009. Since the general federal election of June 2007 Belgium has been facing new tensions between the two main Communities. On one side, the Flemish Community has been claiming a ?great? institutional reform that would significantly enlarge the competences and fiscal capacity of Regions and Communities. On the other the French-speaking Community is reluctant, fearing that this could further dismantle the federal State and reduce solidarity. The Flemish position was first made official in the Resolutions of the Flemish Parliament of March 1999. They ask the transfer to Regions or Communities of employment policy, including unemployment benefits, health care and family benefits. These new policies would be funded, at decentralised level, by the transfer to Regions or Communities of the income tax, part of the VAT and of the corporation tax, and by the creation of two or three regional or community systems of social security contributions. In this paper the Flemish claims are evaluated in the frame of the so-called ?magic square? : autonomy ? responsibility ? solidarity ? tax competition. It is argued that the present-day institutional structure fits the theory of fiscal federalism rather well. Further decentralisation would increase autonomy and responsibility and could create, as the Flemish Community claims, more homogeneous sets of competencies. However it would also affect solidarity and tax competition, and increase drastically the complexity of tax and social legislations and thus increase the administrative burden for multi-regional enterprises. JEL Codes ? H1, H4, H7.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.cairn.info/load_pdf.php?ID_ARTICLE=RPVE_481_0067
File Format: application/pdf
File Function:
Download Restriction: restricted
File URL: http://www.cairn.info/revue-reflets-et-perspectives-de-la-vie-economique-2009-1-page-67.htm
File Format: text/html
File Function:
Download Restriction: restricted

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Publisher Info
Article provided by De Boeck Université in its journal Reflets et perspectives de la vie économique.

Volume (Year): XLVIII (2009)
Issue (Month): 1 ()
Pages: 67-86
Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Handle: RePEc:cai:rpvedb:rpve_481_0067

Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.cairn.info

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Jean-Baptiste de Vathaire).

Related research
Keywords: fiscal federalism; fiscal policy;

Find related papers by JEL classification:
H1 - Public Economics - - Structure and Scope of Government
H4 - Public Economics - - Publicly Provided Goods
H7 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? IDEAS also indexes software components.

This page was last updated on 2009-11-18.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.