Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

« Voie large ou voie étroite de l'économie politique ? » : une interrogation toujours pertinente


Author Info

  • Christian Arnsperger
Registered author(s):


    This paper argues that, since contemporary economic theory is part of the broader endeavor of an individualistic sociology of rational choice, it should impose on itself at least one consistency criterion: the economists working using that paradigm should explain in what sense it was a rational choice for them to become rational-choice economists. Performing this test throws up some interesting properties, as is shown in the paper – not the least, that if (as is highly likely) an individual turns out to have become a rational-choice economist by applying axiological or critical rationality, he ought to endow his model-agents with a similar capacity to formulate non-instrumental goals and to reflect on the society they desire. This, however, undermines the pretense of rational-choice economics to stand as a fluent, “neutral” language hovering above the landscape of theories and paradigms. More historical and political relativity is called for.

    Download Info

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
    File URL:
    Download Restriction: free

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: free

    Bibliographic Info

    Article provided by De Boeck Université in its journal Reflets et perspectives de la vie économique.

    Volume (Year): XLIV (2005)
    Issue (Month): 1 ()
    Pages: 49-55

    as in new window
    Handle: RePEc:cai:rpvedb:rpve_441_0049

    Contact details of provider:
    Web page:

    Related research

    Keywords: Epistemology of economics; rational choice theory; political economy; plurality of paradigms; economics and sociology; critique of economics;


    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.



    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.


    Access and download statistics


    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cai:rpvedb:rpve_441_0049. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Jean-Baptiste de Vathaire).

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.