IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cai/rfglav/rfg_158_0013.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Qualification et compétence : deux sœurs jumelles ?

Author

Listed:
  • Ewan Oiry

Abstract

The present article concerns the notion that skilfulness and proficiency concepts diverge up-to the breaking off. Using the great flow of literature dealing with skillfulness, it shows that since the fifties, three definitions of skillfulness have been given successively. The most recent one does not use as its main feature the concept of work station. Following a similar course, an analysis is carried out concerning the proficiency concept. This latter shows a breach in its definition. In France, the first skillfulness model disputed the continuity with the traditional definition modes of skillfulness. On the other hand, the second one is very close to the most recent definitions of skillfulness. This twofold lesson has strong managerial consequences since it explains certain failures of the proficiency approach and suggests managerial action principles in order to cope with.

Suggested Citation

  • Ewan Oiry, 2005. "Qualification et compétence : deux sœurs jumelles ?," Revue française de gestion, Lavoisier, vol. 158(5), pages 13-34.
  • Handle: RePEc:cai:rfglav:rfg_158_0013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.cairn.info/load_pdf.php?ID_ARTICLE=RFG_158_0013
    Download Restriction: free

    File URL: http://www.cairn.info/revue-francaise-de-gestion-2005-5-page-13.htm
    Download Restriction: free
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Davide Parmigiani & Sarah-Louise Jones & Chiara Silvaggio & Elisabetta Nicchia & Asia Ambrosini & Myrna Pario & Andrea Pedevilla & Ilaria Sardi, 2022. "Assessing Global Competence Within Teacher Education Programs. How to Design and Create a Set of Rubrics With a Modified Delphi Method," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(4), pages 21582440221, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cai:rfglav:rfg_158_0013. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jean-Baptiste de Vathaire (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cairn.info/revue-francaise-de-gestion.htm .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.