IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cai/rerarc/reru_172_0335.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Acceptabilité des choix d’aménagements des friches urbaines polluées

Author

Listed:
  • Béatrice Plottu
  • Marjorie Tendero

Abstract

Brownfield redevelopment provides opportunies to build sustainable cities for the future. However, potential benefits of brownfield redevelopment are underestimated whereas costs are overestimated; brownfields are therefore barely reused. Besides, economic valuation methods are struggling to determine ex ante benefits and in particularly collective benefits and those which are related to non-direct use. In order to address these limitations, we develop an original methodologial framework which combines economic valuation methods questioning individual preferences and participatory techniques. Focus groups and discrete choice experiment are first employed to assess individual risk attitudes and preferences, and then multi-criteria decision analysis is used to compare individual preferences with collective preferences in order to determine a consensual solution in the case of a brownfield redevelopment project. This methodological approach should improve en ante skakeholders? involvement and hence social acceptability of land-use plans.

Suggested Citation

  • Béatrice Plottu & Marjorie Tendero, 2017. "Acceptabilité des choix d’aménagements des friches urbaines polluées," Revue d'économie régionale et urbaine, Armand Colin, vol. 0(2), pages 335-356.
    • Handle: RePEc:cai:rerarc:reru_172_0335
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.cairn.info/load_pdf.php?ID_ARTICLE=RERU_172_0335
    Download Restriction: free
    File URL: http://www.cairn.info/revue-d-economie-regionale-et-urbaine-2017-2-page-335.htm
    Download Restriction: free
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    brownfields; discrete choice experiment; multicriteria decision aid; participatory process; Classification JEL : C90; D74; R52; Q58;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C90 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Design of Experiments - - - General
    • D74 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Conflict; Conflict Resolution; Alliances; Revolutions
    • R52 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Regional Government Analysis - - - Land Use and Other Regulations
    • Q58 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environmental Economics: Government Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cai:rerarc:reru_172_0335. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jean-Baptiste de Vathaire (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cairn.info/revue-d-economie-regionale-et-urbaine.htm .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.