IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cai/repdal/redp_305_0005.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Capital et idéologie en Chine : retour sur les estimations et conclusions de Thomas Piketty

Author

Listed:
  • Cao Ruile

Abstract

Since the beginning of the reform and openness policy, China has experienced tremendous economic transformation which cannot be seen anywhere in the history of modern societies. Understanding the speed, the scope and the stability of the Chinese economic miracle is still a challenge for social scientists, and more particularly for those who analyze the relationship between capital and ideology. Recently, Thomas Piketty dedicated one chapter to income inequalities in China. His estimations indicate that income inequalities have plateaued since the mid-2000s at a level below the United-States. Piketty concludes that China is not tolerant of income inequality. This article analyzes the data and methods used by Piketty. Then, it proposes an alternative evaluation of household income inequality using the Gini index. Based on the China Family Panel Survey, it shows that income inequality has increased until the end of the 2000s, and have been plateaued since then at a level which exceeds the one of the United States. Those estimations corroborate the conclusion of numerous specialists of income inequality in China who demonstrated that Chinese people mostly perceive income inequality as a prerequisite to economic development.

Suggested Citation

  • Cao Ruile, 2020. "Capital et idéologie en Chine : retour sur les estimations et conclusions de Thomas Piketty," Revue d'économie politique, Dalloz, vol. 130(5), pages 683-698.
  • Handle: RePEc:cai:repdal:redp_305_0005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.cairn.info/load_pdf.php?ID_ARTICLE=REDP_305_0005
    Download Restriction: free

    File URL: http://www.cairn.info/revue-d-economie-politique-2020-5-page-683.htm
    Download Restriction: free
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cai:repdal:redp_305_0005. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jean-Baptiste de Vathaire (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cairn.info/revue-d-economie-politique.htm .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.