IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cai/repdal/redp_111_0007.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Beyond Ellsberg's paradox. Modeling the effets of vagueness in risky decisions

Author

Listed:
  • David V. Budescu
  • Kristine M. Kuhn
  • Karen M. Kramer

Abstract

Ellsberg?s famous paradox [1961] focused attention on the importance of the precision of the probabilities underlying risky choice. Following his seminal work numerous studies have demonstrated that people are generally averse to imprecisely specified (vague) probabilities. In many important risky decisions, information about both probabilities and outcomes is imprecise, and previous research has shown vagueness effects for outcomes to be similar to those for probabilities. The current work investigates the joint effects of vagueness on the two attributes. For our purposes, gambles are considered equally vague if the ranges of their possible expected values are identical, and gambles varying in precision are considered equated if their mean expected values are equal. We summarize results from three previous studies where subjects provided Certainty Equivalents (CEs) for, or made pair-wise choices between, equated options that varied in terms of their probabilities, their outcomes, and the precision with which each dimension was specified. We propose a new model for decision making with vaguely specified attributes that generalizes the Prospect Theory model. The model posits a new "vagueness resolution" operation in the editing phase. Consistent with Ellsberg?s formulation, this operation represents a range of values (probabilities or outcomes) by a weighted average of its end points. The results of this operation are used in the evaluation phase to reach decisions (e.g., choices, CEs) regarding vague prospects. The weights attached to the two focal (end) points reflect their relative salience, and can be used to classify preference patterns into vagueness neutral, vagueness avoiding and vagueness seeking behavior. The new model was fit successfully to results from the three studies reviewed. The estimated parameters are consistent with, and confirm, the patterns uncovered by the qualitative analysis. We conclude with a general discussion of the properties of the new model.

Suggested Citation

  • David V. Budescu & Kristine M. Kuhn & Karen M. Kramer, 2001. "Beyond Ellsberg's paradox. Modeling the effets of vagueness in risky decisions," Revue d'économie politique, Dalloz, vol. 111(1), pages 7-28.
  • Handle: RePEc:cai:repdal:redp_111_0007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.cairn.info/load_pdf.php?ID_ARTICLE=REDP_111_0007
    Download Restriction: free

    File URL: http://www.cairn.info/revue-d-economie-politique-2001-1-page-7.htm
    Download Restriction: free
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cai:repdal:redp_111_0007. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jean-Baptiste de Vathaire (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cairn.info/revue-d-economie-politique.htm .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.