IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cai/accafc/cca_243_0097.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Contrôle des performances individuelles et sentiment de justice : une étude de l’apparition de risques psychosociaux dans les grands cabinets d’audit

Author

Listed:
  • Pauline Beau

Abstract

This article presents the results of a case study of Big Four audit firms with the aim of understanding the links between individual performance evaluation, the feeling of justice, and psychosocial risks. It is not our intention to adopt an alarmist tone. Instead, we adopt a qualitative approach to focus on situations in which individual evaluations can create psychosocial risks depending on whether they are judged to be fair or not. We contribute to the literature by showing how a deterioration in the feeling of justice can be a source of insecurity and subjective precarity for the auditor. We also show that the big audit firms can instrumentalize this feeling of justice for self-regulation purposes. Finally, we contribute to studies on the audit profession by exploring how the feeling of justice helps auditors to construct their identity

Suggested Citation

  • Pauline Beau, 2018. "Contrôle des performances individuelles et sentiment de justice : une étude de l’apparition de risques psychosociaux dans les grands cabinets d’audit," ACCRA, Association francophone de comptabilité, vol. 24(3), pages 97-131.
  • Handle: RePEc:cai:accafc:cca_243_0097
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.cairn.info/load_pdf.php?ID_ARTICLE=CCA_243_0097
    Download Restriction: free

    File URL: http://www.cairn.info/revue-comptabilite-controle-audit-2018-3-page-97.htm
    Download Restriction: free
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Beau, Pauline & Jerman, Lambert, 2022. "Bonding forged in “auditing hell”: The emotional qualities of Big Four auditors," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    2. Daoust, Laurence, 2020. "Playing the Big Four recruitment game: The tension between illusio and reflexivity," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cai:accafc:cca_243_0097. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jean-Baptiste de Vathaire (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cairn.info/revue-accra.htm .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.